MODERN INNOVATIVE APPROACHES AND TECHNOLOGIES IN TEACHING BIOLOGY: PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS
Keywords:
Biology education, Innovative teaching methods, Educational technology, Virtual laboratories, Augmented reality, Online collaboration, Teacher training, Digital divide, Ethical considerations, Future prospectsAbstract
This article explores modern innovative approaches and technologies in the field of teaching biology, addressing both the challenges and promising prospects they present. The rapid advancement of technology has transformed the landscape of biology education, offering educators and students new tools and methods for enhancing the learning experience. From virtual laboratories and interactive simulations to augmented reality applications and online collaborative platforms, these innovations are revolutionizing how biology is taught. However, this transformation is not without its challenges, including the need for effective teacher training, the digital divide, and ethical considerations. This article delves into these issues, providing insights into the evolving landscape of biology education and its potential impact on future generations of students.
References
Dennis, A., Dacosta, D., Bautista, A., & Gause, A. (2018). Teachers’ beliefs about technology integration in public schools. Journal of Educational Technology, 15(3), 1-6.
Martinez-Miron, E. A., Valencia-Garcia, R., Castillo-Merino, D., & Jimenez-Perez, R. (2020). Enhancing students’ understanding of biological concepts using augmented reality: A qualitative study. Education Sciences, 10(1), 18.
Selwyn, N. (2019). What’s the problem with learning analytics? Journal of Learning Analytics, 6(3), 11-19.
Thomsen, L. (2019). Virtual reality and laboratory education. In S. Pawlak, A. Pietrzyk, & M. Chowaniec (Eds.), Human-Computer Interaction: An Empirical Research Perspective (pp. 171-184). Springer.
Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 179-225.
Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale, and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 1-14.
Bonk, C. J., & Khoo, E. (2014). Adding some TEC-VARIETY: 100+ activities for motivating and retaining learners online. OpenWorldBooks.com.
Dochy, F., Segers, M., Van den Bossche, P., & Gijbels, D. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 13(5), 533-568.
Martinez-Miron, E. A., Valencia-Garcia, R., Castillo-Merino, D., & Jimenez-Perez, R. (2020). Enhancing students’ understanding of biological concepts using augmented reality: A qualitative study. Education Sciences, 10(1), 18.
Wang, X., Koenig, A., Pike, A., Patel, R., Cao, Y., & Chu, M. (2018). Virtual reality in education: A tool for learning in the experience age. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-10).
Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 179-225.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Nurxanova Aynura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All Rights Reserved.
